Plebscan LogoPlebscan
>a few hundreds per year in the whole west? Are you retarded or are you just ethnically biased towards them? RACIAL MURDERS ARE THOUSANDS EVERY YEAR ACROSS THE WEST. Here's a video showing 35+ murders and attacks against whites in just 1 month in America. https://twitter.com/BIPOCracism/status/1751981691827036659 These are just the ones reported on by tabloid papers that a twitter user added in a video. How many more are there that were unreported? How many more were there across Europe? Far more than 'a few hundred per year'. Alternatively just go onto any American state policy department websites and look at the mug pics, crime and ethnicity. >Unemployment alone kills way more >Iatrogenesis kills way more >Poor diet kills way more >Domestic crimes (men or women) kills way more >Car accidents kills way more. >Even doing sport kills way more. The concern about black on white crime isn't about death you idiot. The concern is that ethnic Europeans who created Europe (which a large part of the world wants to move to) are being replaced in their homeland which their ancestors for 2000+ year fought and bled for. The concern is also premised on the REALITY that 'diversity' is NOT a strength but a social, economic and political disease for any homogenous population whether asian or caucasion. Just look at the example of the previously, peaceful and lovely Sweden: Sweden was the most peaceful country in Europe 30 years ago. Unfortunately now, Sweden is 10-15% non European born and now the 3rd most dangerous country in the EU. It is now the gun capital of Europe with the most gun related homicides. It is now the rape capital of Europe with the most sexual assaults. It is now a terrorist haven with the most terrorist attacks and bombings in Europe (1 bombing every 3 days in 2022). Sweden is an example of a failed multicultural society. Given current trends, this civic disharmony and social destruction will be a growing reality for other European countries the longer mass immigration is accepted and touted as necessary for economic, fertility and diversity justifications (all of which are a malicious lie to destroy the peace & harmony of European and Western society). This is made even worse when such violent crimes by this overrepresented group are met with rehabilitative justice, wherein the judicial system excuses minorities for violent behavior in a feeble attempt to 'understand' criminals and 'prevent recidivism'. Unfortunately this only leads to criminals taking advantage of the judicial systems, destroying the lives of more innocents citizens and wasting tax payer money who fund state and non-state prison infrastructure. There is also significant and understated racially biased reporting. Police departments describe african's race and ethnicity as 'white', in police records to bolster 'white crime', seen here. https://twitter.com/UnbiasedCrime/status/174564565029607026) Why is it that Asia gets multiple ethnostates and can take pride in their people and race? Why is it that the Arab world get multiple ethnostates and can take pride in their people and race? There are 50+ muslim countries out of 195. Why must Europe give them more? Why can do Indians get India and take pride in their people, race and main cultures (Hinduism, Seiks and Jainism)? If so why can't there be just one Europane country full of Europeans who can take pride in their people, race and culture? European elites describe whites as 'eternally evil', equating whiteness to original sin, in stark relief to the atrocities by non-white ethnic groups, inflicted on Europeans & other ethnic groups, described below. It must end. Why does mainstream media always blame ALL Europeans for the atrocities of the British Empire? Why does mainstream media ignore the black moors of Africa who rampaged Italy and rapes and murdered so many. Why does mainstream media ignore the atrocities of the Ottoman Empire who colonized Spain and Portugal for 800+ years (one of the longest standing colonization projects in humanity) leading to the slaughter of millions of Christians and enslavement of Europeans? Why was it that when Spain kicked out Islamic and Jewish people in 1495 that the Spanish Golden Age begun? Is it because banishment led to ethnic & cultural homogeneity (euro & christian/pagan) which lead to less civil conflict between opposing religions and cultures? Why does mainstream media ignore the Barbary Pirates who enslave, raped and murdered millions of white Europeans up until 200 years ago. Why does mainstream media ignore Mongolian subjugation of millions or Japan's colonial projects? Why are all these examples ignored in the face of Europe colonialism? Why does mainstream media IGNORE the CONTEMPORARY slave trade in Africa by OTHER AFRICANS or by arabs like in Libya or gulf states enslaving their Pakistani 'muslim brothers' through indentured servitude? I will answer these questions. European elites rarely talk about these issues & instead favor European self-fragilization because they have no loyalty to their own and actively want to harm and destroy European people & their society. It is either that or they seek to manufacture civil chaos to increase selection pressures for Europeans (and either Europeans innovate and overcome these selection pressures, hardening their genetics OR they get destroyed spiritually and then physically).

3 direct replies

"This implies that the anti white bias merely serves as a control measure with no end goal in site; this implies that elites have no end goal apart from control in the present. This ignores the incidental reality that they want to OPTIMISE their capacity for control. This is done through destruction of the nationstate and its elements of racial, economic, political, cultural and social cohesiveness." This is clearly a class conflict. Motivated by class domination. Destroying national identity and tradition, which are resistance for total class domination. Yes they want multiculturalism. But it's not about multiculturalism per se. It's about replacing white population which are class conscious, or at least a little class conscious, with muslim population who don't even know what class struggle is. The final goal is about reinforcing the dominant class position. Again, it's not, for them about race. They would prefer a white proletariat if the white proletariat was submissive. But in reality, the white proletariat is less submissive than the muslim proletariat. Indeed muslims do not care about class struggle. They only care about the Holy Quran. And are happy to be exploited as wage slaves if they can go to the mosque.
It's really not about race. It's about using racial tension, to continue domination and exploitation. Working class fragmentation. As well as importing lower wages workers. More profit. And it works nicely since 150 years. Already been used in England 150 years ago with the tensions between English workers and Irish workers. It worked then and it stills works now. They don't give a shit about destroying white europeans or their society either. You still don't get it. They do not care about the color of their slaves. Only thing important for them, is for them to keep having slaves.
It's really not about race. It's about using racial tension, to continue domination and exploitation. Working class fragmentation. As well as importing lower wages workers. More profit. And it works nicely since 150 years. Already been used in England 150 years ago with the tensions between English workers and Irish workers. It worked then and it stills works now. They don't give a shit about destroying white europeans or their society either. You still don't get it. They do not care about the color of their slaves. Only thing important for them, is for them to keep having slaves.