>It's really not about race. You are dismissing all my previous arguments. I won't repeat them. 13% of the population committing 60% of convicted murders has little to do with 'continued domination and exploitation'. Other races like Mexicans, Asians or Hindu don't exhibit similar criminal tendencies. >Working class fragmentation. Poor white majority states and countries in America have less or similar crime rates as wealthy states and counties in america. Against, this is not replicated by Asian, Indian or even Mexican comparisons. >Already been used in England 150 years ago with the tensions between English workers and Irish workers. Friction was overcome because broadly speaking THEY WERE OF SIMILAR BLOOD AND CULTURE (European Anglo & Celtic). Try importing 100 million Africans into Africa or India and see if Africa or India maintains its civic unity and structure. >They don't give a shit about destroying white europeans or their society either. You are either a glowie, a sheltered wealthy white private schooled brat or mentally impaired. There is an explicitly anti white bias in the media. It vocalizes explicit hatred for Europe, its people and its civic unity and it will not stop until everyone European is culturally and racially destroyed. After that, it aims to destroy all other 'idol worshipers' such as Indian Hindus and Asian Buddhists or Confuciusists and all other nationalistic and racially distinct demographics. >They do not care about the color of their slaves. Of course they do. They want their slaves to be raceless, cultureless, nation state less, deracinated mess of muddied servitudes while the elites maintain their 'whiteness'. This is because a nation of prideful, healthy and racially and culture distinct citizens in a functional nation state is harder to subvert and control. Such a state is far less likely to accept international treaties and laws from unelected bureaucrats in Zurich, NYC and London. If all borders are destroyed (racially, culturally, politically and economically) then the powers that be can control the populations easily. This means that the economics and fertility argument, are merely the political veneer through which to justify mass immigration and achieve the ulterior motive of destruction of the nation state, destroying racial, culture, political and economic nationalism and distinctiveness. If the elites didn't care about the color of their slaves, then they would not spend so much on food aid on Africa (parabolically increasing its population) for 70+ years while at the same type spearheading anti-natalist attitudes in Europe. If elites don't care about race then why didn't they create programs for naturally improving European birthrates (extreme tax cuts and subsidies in similar quantum to money spent on African food aid). Would that not maintain civil society (less need for cultural assimilation) while also being less resource intensive and sustainable? Instead refugee crisis are created in the Middle East and Africa and then mass imported into Europe to destroy European civic unity. How can you describe the elite's anti white bias as a mere 'divide and conquer' strategy or economic strategy? This implies that the anti white bias merely serves as a control measure with no end goal in site; this implies that elites have no end goal apart from control in the present. This ignores the incidental reality that they want to OPTIMISE their capacity for control. This is done through destruction of the nationstate and its elements of racial, economic, political, cultural and social cohesiveness.