im 25 and never seen a vagina. however, i own billions of plebbit tokens. plebbit tokens at 1 billion + market cap is worth more than being a normie sex haver.

I sometimes wonder if such people are paid psyops and not actual deranged self-hating retards. If its real, then its a good thing that those self-flagellating idiots are selecting their genes out of the gene pool. This is unironically eugenic for Europe as Europe won't need to deal with their antisocial, dysgenic self-hating & destructive attitudes through their bloodline. The damage they inflict is mostly limited to themselves.

call an ambulance

ur butiful my friend

ayyyyyyyyyyy!!

this is what modernity thinks btw. its over.

a picturesque sunset picture is only worth looking if theres swim suit model BOOOOOOBA involved

wtf where the SEXOOOOOOOOOOOOOO????

>It's about replacing white population which are class conscious, or at least a little class conscious, with muslim population who don't even know what class struggle is. Muslims and blacks are class conscious. Every racial demographic is. You only need to look at the rebellions mounted by both demographics (or any demographic) over 2000+ years of modern history to see this. Every demographic will feel undermined by authoritarian wealth inequity. >But in reality, the white proletariat is less submissive than the muslim proletariat...[Muslims] are happy to be exploited as wage slaves if they can go to the mosque. Watch modern day successful rebellions in Islamic states eg Pakistan or Libya or failed uprisings like Syria and gulf states. These are all premised on ideological Islamic differences but also the social feeling that the lower class is feeling slighted by the authoritarian, wealthy leaders. Even if your deranged theory that 'Muslim populations' do not 'know what class struggle is', was true, and this was utilized by elites to undermine European society, then this theory would still still be RACE, not class based...you are still arguing about a racial distinction, which would have a biological reality. You only need to look at 2000 years of Islamic history, particularly the Ottomans, to realize Islamic history is premised on persecution of minorities and Islamic proselytization at the tip of the sword. Look at the previously Christian Jordan or Zoroastrian Iran - all but wiped out. If the elites wanted a 'submissive demographic' they wouldn't choose Islam because Islam is anything but submissive to the outgroup (elites). The only thing it submits to is the Islamic ideology itself (God). All outgroup philosophies, that are not Islamic, are destroyed if the outgroup fails to overcome Islamic proselytization. This is anything but submissive and not preferable by the elites. The difference is this just didn't occur with the frequency and reach of European pagans and christians. >They would prefer a white proletariat if the white proletariat was submissive. This argument is now just turning into what comes first chicken or the egg (race or class?). Firstly, Elites don't want a white proletariat because a white proletariat are genetically the most similar to the elites. If the underclass racially distinguishes itself from the elites, the elites find it mentally easier to persecute and enslave the masses which they see as an outgroup. The elites find it easier therefore, to enslave a rootless, globular, mixed race global population with no identity compared to numerous nationalistic and racially prideful European demographics. Secondly, if we use your assumption that certain races can/cant identify class inequity as well as others, this is largely explained by genetic differences in interracial genetic expression regarding average pre frontal cortexes and amygdala development. This is an issue of RACE not 'class domination'. Thirdly, there is the indisputable truth that Western elites are threatened by the European RACE because of the historical reality imbuing a 2000 year grudge against Pagan Rome (European genetics), which buckbroke all other Abrahamic religions for hundreds of years and slaughtered its own European leaders every 10-20 years. Pagan Rome then, with great irony, became Abrahamic itself through Christian proselytization against Germanic, Celtic and Slavic Pagans who were also enslaved, backbroke and forcibly converted. Yet, even with this new Christianized culture, Europe continued to mount religiously mandated wars against all others (this time against the remaining Abrahamics and many other European and non-European Pagans). Whether Europe was Christian or Pagan it continued to destroy outgroups, as well as its own ingroups who they deemed as corrupt. This implies a genetic element. These reasons explain why the Western elite want to DESTROY European genetics and culture. Incidental to this, when the elites are (God forbid) done with European society they will then set about destroying (homogenizing) Asia, India, Arabia and Africa with each other to destroy all these other seeds of racial and cultural distinctiveness (nationalism) while preserving their own genetics.

"This implies that the anti white bias merely serves as a control measure with no end goal in site; this implies that elites have no end goal apart from control in the present. This ignores the incidental reality that they want to OPTIMISE their capacity for control. This is done through destruction of the nationstate and its elements of racial, economic, political, cultural and social cohesiveness." This is clearly a class conflict. Motivated by class domination. Destroying national identity and tradition, which are resistance for total class domination. Yes they want multiculturalism. But it's not about multiculturalism per se. It's about replacing white population which are class conscious, or at least a little class conscious, with muslim population who don't even know what class struggle is. The final goal is about reinforcing the dominant class position. Again, it's not, for them about race. They would prefer a white proletariat if the white proletariat was submissive. But in reality, the white proletariat is less submissive than the muslim proletariat. Indeed muslims do not care about class struggle. They only care about the Holy Quran. And are happy to be exploited as wage slaves if they can go to the mosque.

I just posted

gm

Ok libtard, what’s next, Santa Claus isn’t real? Gay atheist

that is not real

>It's really not about race. You are dismissing all my previous arguments. I won't repeat them. 13% of the population committing 60% of convicted murders has little to do with 'continued domination and exploitation'. Other races like Mexicans, Asians or Hindu don't exhibit similar criminal tendencies. >Working class fragmentation. Poor white majority states and countries in America have less or similar crime rates as wealthy states and counties in america. Against, this is not replicated by Asian, Indian or even Mexican comparisons. >Already been used in England 150 years ago with the tensions between English workers and Irish workers. Friction was overcome because broadly speaking THEY WERE OF SIMILAR BLOOD AND CULTURE (European Anglo & Celtic). Try importing 100 million Africans into Africa or India and see if Africa or India maintains its civic unity and structure. >They don't give a shit about destroying white europeans or their society either. You are either a glowie, a sheltered wealthy white private schooled brat or mentally impaired. There is an explicitly anti white bias in the media. It vocalizes explicit hatred for Europe, its people and its civic unity and it will not stop until everyone European is culturally and racially destroyed. After that, it aims to destroy all other 'idol worshipers' such as Indian Hindus and Asian Buddhists or Confuciusists and all other nationalistic and racially distinct demographics. >They do not care about the color of their slaves. Of course they do. They want their slaves to be raceless, cultureless, nation state less, deracinated mess of muddied servitudes while the elites maintain their 'whiteness'. This is because a nation of prideful, healthy and racially and culture distinct citizens in a functional nation state is harder to subvert and control. Such a state is far less likely to accept international treaties and laws from unelected bureaucrats in Zurich, NYC and London. If all borders are destroyed (racially, culturally, politically and economically) then the powers that be can control the populations easily. This means that the economics and fertility argument, are merely the political veneer through which to justify mass immigration and achieve the ulterior motive of destruction of the nation state, destroying racial, culture, political and economic nationalism and distinctiveness. If the elites didn't care about the color of their slaves, then they would not spend so much on food aid on Africa (parabolically increasing its population) for 70+ years while at the same type spearheading anti-natalist attitudes in Europe. If elites don't care about race then why didn't they create programs for naturally improving European birthrates (extreme tax cuts and subsidies in similar quantum to money spent on African food aid). Would that not maintain civil society (less need for cultural assimilation) while also being less resource intensive and sustainable? Instead refugee crisis are created in the Middle East and Africa and then mass imported into Europe to destroy European civic unity. How can you describe the elite's anti white bias as a mere 'divide and conquer' strategy or economic strategy? This implies that the anti white bias merely serves as a control measure with no end goal in site; this implies that elites have no end goal apart from control in the present. This ignores the incidental reality that they want to OPTIMISE their capacity for control. This is done through destruction of the nationstate and its elements of racial, economic, political, cultural and social cohesiveness.

correct. they only want a make it bag of plebbit (14.9 billion plebbits) which = 1% of the supply. at 10b market cap that is 100m.

im a conversationless and handholdless virgin. i literally never spoken to a female 1 on 1 apart from my mother.

It's really not about race. It's about using racial tension, to continue domination and exploitation. Working class fragmentation. As well as importing lower wages workers. More profit. And it works nicely since 150 years. Already been used in England 150 years ago with the tensions between English workers and Irish workers. It worked then and it stills works now. They don't give a shit about destroying white europeans or their society either. You still don't get it. They do not care about the color of their slaves. Only thing important for them, is for them to keep having slaves.

It's really not about race. It's about using racial tension, to continue domination and exploitation. Working class fragmentation. As well as importing lower wages workers. More profit. And it works nicely since 150 years. Already been used in England 150 years ago with the tensions between English workers and Irish workers. It worked then and it stills works now. They don't give a shit about destroying white europeans or their society either. You still don't get it. They do not care about the color of their slaves. Only thing important for them, is for them to keep having slaves.